By Nazarov S. A., Sweers G. H.

Permit Ω be a website with piecewise gentle boundary. typically, it really is most unlikely to procure a generalized answer u ∈ W 2 2 (Ω) of the equation with the boundary stipulations by means of fixing iteratively a method of 2 Poisson equations below homogeneous Dirichlet stipulations. this sort of process is got by means of environment v = −Δu. within the two-dimensional case, this truth is named the Sapongyan paradox within the concept of easily supported polygonal plates. within the current paper, the three-d challenge is investigated for a site with a tender aspect Γ. If the variable beginning attitude α ∈ is under π all over at the aspect, then the boundary-value challenge for the biharmonic equation is corresponding to the iterated Dirichlet challenge, and its answer u inherits the positivity retaining estate from those difficulties. within the case α ∈ (π, 2π), the technique of fixing the 2 Dirichlet difficulties needs to be transformed through allowing infinite-dimensional kernel and co-kernel of the operators and choosing the answer u ∈ (Ω) by way of inverting a undeniable essential operator at the contour Γ. If α(s) ∈ (3π/2,2π) for some extent s ∈ Γ, then there exists a nonnegative functionality f ∈ (Ω) for which the answer u adjustments signal contained in the area Ω. with regards to crack (α = 2π all over the place on Γ), one must introduce a unique scale of weighted functionality areas. accordingly, the positivity conserving estate fails. In a few geometrical events, the issues on well-posedness for the boundary-value challenge for the biharmonic equation and the positivity estate stay open.

Show description

Read or Download A boundary-value problem for the biharmonic equation and the iterated Laplacian in a 3D-domain with an edge PDF

Best mathematics books

Extra resources for A boundary-value problem for the biharmonic equation and the iterated Laplacian in a 3D-domain with an edge

Example text

4. If (X, d) is a locally compact separable metric space, then the vector space of all Lipschitz functions with compact support is dense in Cc (X) and in C0 (X) (with respect to the topology generated by the uniform norm, of course). Consequently, Lip(X) is dense in C0 (X). Proof. 3. Since the sum or the product of two Lipschitz functions is Lipschitz, it follows that all the functions in A have compact supports and are Lipschitz. Since A is dense in C0 (X), it follows that the assertions of the corollary are true.

L) For every x ∈ Γ and every Banach limit L let εx : C0 (X) → R be defined (L) by εx (f ) = L ( f, T n δx )n∈N∪{0} for every f ∈ C0 (X). It is easy to see that (L) (L) εx is a positive linear functional, so εx is also continuous. Accordingly, we may (L) and do think of εx as an element of M(X). 1. If x ∈ Γ and L is a Banach limit, then εx measure. is a T -invariant Proof. Let φ : Cb (X) → R be defined by φ(f ) = L ( f, T n δx )n∈N∪{0} for every f ∈ Cb (X). Clearly, φ is a positive linear functional, φ (1X ) = 1, and the restriction (L) of φ to C0 (X) is εx .

2. Invariant Probabilities 21 The next theorem summarizes various results of Chapter 4 of Revuz’s book [57]. 6. Let (S, T ) be a Markov–Feller pair defined on a locally compact separable metric space (X, d), and let µ ∈ M(X) be a T -invariant probability. e. to a µ-integrable k=0 function g, and f, µ = n∈N g dµ. Proof. It is well-known that the Radon–Nikodym theorem implies that the set of all the elements of M(X) that are absolutely continuous with respect to the measure µ is a Banach subspace of M(X) that is isometric to L1 (X, B(X), µ).

Download PDF sample

A boundary-value problem for the biharmonic equation and the iterated Laplacian in a 3D-domain with an edge by Nazarov S. A., Sweers G. H.


by Anthony
4.2

Rated 4.25 of 5 – based on 39 votes